By way of background, on Saturday, March 11, 2006, D. Railer posted on
the Hi Rail Times of the Coilcouplers web site, that according to their
inside sources at Lionel, "MTH recently sued Lionel for patent
infringement", involving synchronized smoke, and asking for $15,000,000
in damages. This information made its way on to the OGR forum under a
thread called "guess what, another lawsuit." I posted a response to
this thread, stating that no one had seen the lawsuit papers, namely a
complaint, which must be filed with the court to start a legal action.
This would need to occur before a defendant is served with the complaint,
usually by a process server. I also stated I asked Charlie of Nassau
Hobbies to get a copy of the complaint and that I would publish a summary
of it in a few days.
On Sunday, March 12, Charlie forwarded me an e-mail sent to him by MTH
president Mike Wolf, stating that a lawsuit had NOT been filed by MTH
against Lionel for patent infringement. Charlie posted this information
on the AOL message board and I posted it on the OGR forum. Later on
Sunday, Mike Wolf, emailed me directly from China where is presently on
business, and again stated MTH had not sued Lionel, and called the coil
couplers post a "lie."
Thinking there could be a mistake or misinformation on Coilcouplers end
since Mike Wolf was adamant that a lawsuit had not been filed, I emailed
them seeking an explanation and asking for proof that a lawsuit had been
filed, such as by sending me a copy of the complaint. I never received
a response.
However, on Monday evening, March 13, 2006, The Coilcouplers web site
posted a "correction" stating "MTH recently filed a 17 million dollar
claim against Lionel for patent infringement." It basically altered its
earlier "lawsuit" statement and replaced it with one stating a "claim"
had been filed with the court. Specifically, the current statement reads,
"There was some confusion caused by our describing the MTH claim as a
lawsuit in our previous article which this one replaces. In essence this
MTH claim is the same as a lawsuit. Lionel is required to respond and
defend against this outrageous MTH claim of 17 million dollars in damages
before leaving bankruptcy." The web site also posted two documents as
links which I have reviewed. They are a proof of claim for patent
infringement (and not a complaint which starts a lawsuit) filed with the
bankruptcy court where Lionel's bankruptcy is pending, on August 3, 2005
(over 7 months ago).
The following is what I have determined from the above facts. Firstly,
Mike Wolf was correct that a lawsuit by MTH against Lionel for patent
infringement has not been filed.
Second, the Coilcouplers web site statement that Lionel is "required to
defend" the claim in the same way since it is in essence a lawsuit, is
not accurate since a defendant must file an answer when a complaint has
been filed with the court and served on the defendant.
Moreover, it was Coilcoupers that initiated this whole matter by wrongly
stating MTH had recently sued Lionel, and then having to alter its
statement when confronted with the fact it was incorrect. Perhaps it
should have better checked it facts before posting its first article,
instead of having to later correct it. Tensions in the three rail run
high when lawsuits are involved, and I'm sure Clyde Coil as his
associates are well aware of this. MIke Wolf has informed me it is Neil
Young, that set up and paid for the Coilcouplers web site, and posts
some of the material on it. As a 20% owner of Lionel, he should know if a
lawsuit has been filed as opposed to a claim being made even though he is
not an attorney. Mike Wolf's proof that Neil Young is involved in the
Coilcouplers web site is by way of a copy of a check he has in his
possession, and the web site manager who stated under oath that he gets
material to post from Neil via e-mail. Mr. Wolf has offered to send me a
copy of the check once he returns from China in two weeks.
Lastly, the claim is not that "recent", since it was filed over 7 months
ago. If Coilcouplers was so concerned about it, why didn't they mention
it earlier? The two documents it linked to its March 13 statement are
public documents since they are required to be filed with the court, and
have been for some time.
We will probably never know if the first Coilcouplers on-line post was
an honest mistake or intended to distort the real facts. However, trying
to spin a correction by stating a claim is the same thing as filing a
lawsuit or suing, is not accurate.
As a side note, prior to the Coilcouplers correction on March 13, Mike
Wolf emailed me the same day and stated he does not have any plans to
file a suit, unless Lionel, who has just threatened to recently sue him
for infringing on its patents for TMCC and speed control, does so. He
also claims part of Lionel's goal is to ask the court take DCS (MTH's
digital remote control system) off the market. If Lionel sues him, MTH
plans to counter sue, concerning Lionel allegedly infringing on MTH's
patent for synchronized smoke. Mike's position is MTH is 100% confident
it has all the prior art necessary to defend DCS against Lionel's claim,
and they have let Lionel know this.
Erol Gurcan, ESQ
Thanks for the update, Erol.